REVIEW 1 cited by
On strong mass segregation around a massive black hole: Implications for lower-frequency gravitational-wave astrophysics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On strong mass segregation around a massive black hole: Implications for lower-frequency gravitational-wave astrophysics
read the original abstract
We present, for the first time, a clear $N$-body realization of the {\it strong mass segregation} solution for the stellar distribution around a massive black hole. We compare our $N$-body results with those obtained by solving the orbit-averaged Fokker-Planck (FP) equation in energy space. The $N$-body segregation is slightly stronger than in the FP solution, but both confirm the {\it robustness} of the regime of strong segregation when the number fraction of heavy stars is a (realistically) small fraction of the total population. In view of recent observations revealing a dearth of giant stars in the sub-parsec region of the Milky Way, we show that the time scales associated with cusp re-growth are not longer than $(0.1-0.25) \times T_{rlx}(r_h)$. These time scales are shorter than a Hubble time for black holes masses $\mbul \lesssim 4 \times 10^6 M_\odot$ and we conclude that quasi-steady, mass segregated, stellar cusps may be common around MBHs in this mass range. Since EMRI rates scale as $\mbul^{-\alpha}$, with $\alpha \in [1\4,1]$, a good fraction of these events should originate from strongly segregated stellar cusps.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From S2 to LISA: Astrometric Bounds on Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals and Bursts
GRAVITY/S2 astrometry constrains the Galactic Centre stellar-mass black-hole cusp, giving upper limits of ~2.4×10^2 Gyr^-1 on the Milky Way EMRI rate and ~0.2 yr^-1 on detectable EMRBs, with a potentially LISA-visible...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.