REVIEW 1 cited by
On the resolution of quantum paradoxes by weak measurements
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On the resolution of quantum paradoxes by weak measurements
read the original abstract
In this presentation, I argue that weak measurements empirically support the notion of quantum superpositions as statistical alternatives. In short, weak measurements show that Schroedinger's cat is already dead or alive before the measurement. The collapse of the wavefunction in a strong measurement should therefore be separated into the statistical selection of one of the available alternatives and a physical interaction that causes decoherence. The application to entanglement reveals that measurements in A have no physical effect in B, resolving the paradox of Bell`s inequality violation in favor of locality and against (non-empirical) realism.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Coherence as a resource for $N$-box and quantum pigeonhole paradoxes
N-box and quantum pigeonhole PPS paradoxes hold if and only if a single paradox-specific weak value is anomalous, which requires coherence of both pre- and post-selected states.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.