REVIEW 1 cited by
Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: II. Minor-universal graph design
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: II. Minor-universal graph design
read the original abstract
In [Choi08], we introduced the notion of minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum optimization. A minor-embedding of a graph G in a quantum hardware graph U is a subgraph of U such that G can be obtained from it by contracting edges. In this paper, we describe the intertwined adiabatic quantum architecture design problem, which is to construct a hardware graph U that satisfies all known physical constraints and, at the same time, permits an efficient minor-embedding algorithm. We illustrate an optimal complete-graph-minor hardware graph. Given a family F of graphs, a (host) graph U is called F-minor-universal if for each graph G in F, U contains a minor-embedding of G. The problem for designing a F-minor-universal hardware graph U_{sparse} in which F consists of a family of sparse graphs (e.g., bounded degree graphs) is open.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quantum Portfolio Optimization: An Extensive Benchmark
On a new 260-instance real-world benchmark, classical MIP and heuristics clearly outperform quantum annealing and QAOA for a volatility-minimizing portfolio optimization variant.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.