Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: II. Minor-universal graph design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1001.3116 v2 pith:FEN6QJ53 submitted 2010-01-18 quant-ph cs.CC

Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: II. Minor-universal graph design

classification quant-ph cs.CC
keywords graphminor-embeddinghardwarequantumadiabaticgraphsdesignf-minor-universal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In [Choi08], we introduced the notion of minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum optimization. A minor-embedding of a graph G in a quantum hardware graph U is a subgraph of U such that G can be obtained from it by contracting edges. In this paper, we describe the intertwined adiabatic quantum architecture design problem, which is to construct a hardware graph U that satisfies all known physical constraints and, at the same time, permits an efficient minor-embedding algorithm. We illustrate an optimal complete-graph-minor hardware graph. Given a family F of graphs, a (host) graph U is called F-minor-universal if for each graph G in F, U contains a minor-embedding of G. The problem for designing a F-minor-universal hardware graph U_{sparse} in which F consists of a family of sparse graphs (e.g., bounded degree graphs) is open.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Portfolio Optimization: An Extensive Benchmark

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    On a new 260-instance real-world benchmark, classical MIP and heuristics clearly outperform quantum annealing and QAOA for a volatility-minimizing portfolio optimization variant.