Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection - Towards Model-Independent Searches of New Physics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1112.3329 v3 pith:EZBNKNZW submitted 2011-12-14 physics.data-an hep-exstat.APstat.ML

Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection - Towards Model-Independent Searches of New Physics

classification physics.data-an hep-exstat.APstat.ML
keywords modelbackgroundsignaltraininganomalyclassificationdatadetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most classification algorithms used in high energy physics fall under the category of supervised machine learning. Such methods require a training set containing both signal and background events and are prone to classification errors should this training data be systematically inaccurate for example due to the assumed MC model. To complement such model-dependent searches, we propose an algorithm based on semi-supervised anomaly detection techniques, which does not require a MC training sample for the signal data. We first model the background using a multivariate Gaussian mixture model. We then search for deviations from this model by fitting to the observations a mixture of the background model and a number of additional Gaussians. This allows us to perform pattern recognition of any anomalous excess over the background. We show by a comparison to neural network classifiers that such an approach is a lot more robust against misspecification of the signal MC than supervised classification. In cases where there is an unexpected signal, a neural network might fail to correctly identify it, while anomaly detection does not suffer from such a limitation. On the other hand, when there are no systematic errors in the training data, both methods perform comparably.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towards anomaly detection searches for new physics signatures including Higgs bosons with weakly supervised machine learning

    hep-ex 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    HAXAD, a weakly supervised anomaly-detection search for Higgs-plus-X new physics, is extended with new embeddings and limit-setting, and on 470 fb^-1 of pseudo-data it matches or exceeds the best single cut-based limi...