REVIEW 3 cited by
The PAV algorithm optimizes binary proper scoring rules
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The PAV algorithm optimizes binary proper scoring rules
read the original abstract
There has been much recent interest in application of the pool-adjacent-violators (PAV) algorithm for the purpose of calibrating the probabilistic outputs of automatic pattern recognition and machine learning algorithms. Special cost functions, known as proper scoring rules form natural objective functions to judge the goodness of such calibration. We show that for binary pattern classifiers, the non-parametric optimization of calibration, subject to a monotonicity constraint, can be solved by PAV and that this solution is optimal for all regular binary proper scoring rules. This extends previous results which were limited to convex binary proper scoring rules. We further show that this result holds not only for calibration of probabilities, but also for calibration of log-likelihood-ratios, in which case optimality holds independently of the prior probabilities of the pattern classes.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
PS-PPO: Prefix-Sampling PPO for Critic-Free RLHF
PS-PPO samples a per-trajectory cutoff and importance-weights truncated gradients, preserving the full critic-free update in expectation while cutting RLHF training compute and memory.
-
PS-PPO: Prefix-Sampling PPO for Critic-Free RLHF
PS-PPO samples prefixes of trajectories in critic-free RLHF and uses importance-weighted updates to reduce compute and memory while claiming to preserve the full-trajectory objective.
-
AMECxSV: Adaptive Metadata-Driven Embedding-Fusion Calibration for X-Lingual Speaker Verification
A metadata-conditioned MLP backend fused with fixed speaker-verification scores reduces EER and improves calibration in X-lingual trials when language and duration cues are available.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.