Recognition: unknown
Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation
read the original abstract
Object detection performance, as measured on the canonical PASCAL VOC dataset, has plateaued in the last few years. The best-performing methods are complex ensemble systems that typically combine multiple low-level image features with high-level context. In this paper, we propose a simple and scalable detection algorithm that improves mean average precision (mAP) by more than 30% relative to the previous best result on VOC 2012---achieving a mAP of 53.3%. Our approach combines two key insights: (1) one can apply high-capacity convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to bottom-up region proposals in order to localize and segment objects and (2) when labeled training data is scarce, supervised pre-training for an auxiliary task, followed by domain-specific fine-tuning, yields a significant performance boost. Since we combine region proposals with CNNs, we call our method R-CNN: Regions with CNN features. We also compare R-CNN to OverFeat, a recently proposed sliding-window detector based on a similar CNN architecture. We find that R-CNN outperforms OverFeat by a large margin on the 200-class ILSVRC2013 detection dataset. Source code for the complete system is available at http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~rbg/rcnn.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Deep neural networks exhibit distributed high-level semantic representations and discontinuous input-output mappings vulnerable to transferable adversarial perturbations.
-
SAM 3D: 3Dfy Anything in Images
SAM 3D reconstructs 3D objects from single images with geometry, texture, and pose using human-model annotated data at scale and synthetic-to-real training, achieving 5:1 human preference wins.
-
Learning to count small and clustered objects with application to bacterial colonies
ACFamNet Pro reaches 9.64% mean normalized absolute error on bacterial colony images under 5-fold cross-validation, beating FamNet by 12.71%.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.