pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1312.6181 · v2 · pith:GOFXBSZ3new · submitted 2013-12-21 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· nucl-th

Comment on the Nature of the D_{s1}^*(2710) and D_{sJ}^*(2860) Mesons

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exnucl-th
keywords statesstateobservedbeenlikelymesonsmodelnature
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Two charm-strange mesons, the $D_{s1}^*(2710)$ and the $D_{sJ}^*(2860)$, have recently been observed by several experiments. There has been speculation in the literature that the $D_{s1}^*(2710)$ is the $2^3S_1(c\bar{s})$ state and the $D_{sJ}^*(2860)$ is the $1^3D_1(c\bar{s})$ state. In this paper we explore this and other explanations in the context of the relativized quark model and the pseudoscalar emission decay model. We conclude that the $D_{s1}^*(2710)$ is most likely the $1^3D_1 (c\bar{s})$ state and the $D_{sJ}^*(2860)$ is most likely the $1^3D_3 (c\bar{s})$ state with the $1D_2$ resonances also contributing to the observed signals and explaining the observed ratios of branching ratios to $D^*K$ and $DK$ final states. We point out that measuring the $D_{sJ}^*(2860)$ spin can support or eliminate this explanation and that there are six excited $D_s$ states in this mass region; the $2^3S_1$, $2^1S_0$, $1^3D_1$, $1^3D_3$ and two $1D_2$ states. Observing some of the missing states would help confirm the nature of the $D_{s1}^*(2710)$ and the $D_{sJ}^*(2860)$ states.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. $D_{(s)}(2S)$ and $D^{*}_{(s)}(2S)$ production in nonleptonic $B_{(s)}$ weak decays

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Covariant light-front calculations predict branching ratios of 10^{-5} to 10^{-3} for B(s) to D(s)(2S) and D*(s)(2S) plus light mesons, larger than Bethe-Salpeter results but consistent with other quark models.