REVIEW 1 cited by
Supersymmetry, Naturalness, and Light Higgsinos
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Supersymmetry, Naturalness, and Light Higgsinos
read the original abstract
We compare and contrast three different sensitivity measures, $\Delta_{EW}^{-1}$, $\Delta_{HS}^{-1}$ and $\Delta_{BG}^{-1}$ that have been used in discussions of fine-tuning. We argue that though not a fine-tuning measure, $\Delta_{EW}$, which is essentially determined by the particle spectrum, is important because $\Delta_{EW}^{-1}$ quantifies the minimum fine-tuning present in any theory with a specified spectrum. We emphasize the critical role of incorporating correlations between various model parameters in discussions of fine-tuning. We provide toy examples to show that if we can find high scale theories with specific correlations amongst parameters, the value of the traditional fine-tuning measure $\Delta_{BG}^{-1}$ (which differs significantly from $\Delta_{HS}^{-1}$ only when these correlations are important) would be close to $\Delta_{EW}^{-1}$. We then set up the radiatively driven natural SUSY framework that we advocate for phenomenological analyses of natural models of supersymmetry, and review the implications of naturalness for LHC and ILC searches for SUSY as well as for searches for SUSY dark matter.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Can blind spots save neutralino dark matter in natural supersymmetry models?
Direct-detection blind spots fail to rescue stable light higgsino dark matter in electroweak-natural NUHM2/NUHM3 models once LZ, LHC soft-dilepton, and Higgs-mass constraints are imposed.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.