pith. sign in

arxiv: 1506.02499 · v3 · pith:M4QFJVL7new · submitted 2015-06-08 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-th

Where to look for natural supersymmetry

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-th
keywords mssmbetahiggsbayesianfindinglesssimnaturalnaturalness
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Why is natural supersymmetry neither detected nor ruled-out to date? To answer this question we use the Bayesian approach where the emphasis on finding prior-independent features within broader and minimally biased frames is taken as the guiding principle. The 20-parameter minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) fits to subjective naturalness indicate the existence of a prior-independent upper bound on the pseudoscalar Higgs boson mass $m_A$ as a function of $\tan \beta$, the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the MSSM Higgs doublets. For a 30-parameter MSSM this implies that $m_A \lesssim 3$ TeV and $\tan \beta \lesssim 25$ at 95\% Bayesian confidence. Removing the contradictory subjectiveness within the electroweak fine-tuning measure leads to finding the naturalness line, $m_A \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \, m_Z \, \tan \beta,$ that reduces by one the number of MSSM Higgs sector free parameters.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Symbolic Classification-Enabled LHC Limits Online BSM Global Fits

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Symbolic regression produces an approximate classifier for LHC exclusion limits that enables their direct inclusion during pMSSM global fits.