Where to look for natural supersymmetry
read the original abstract
Why is natural supersymmetry neither detected nor ruled-out to date? To answer this question we use the Bayesian approach where the emphasis on finding prior-independent features within broader and minimally biased frames is taken as the guiding principle. The 20-parameter minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) fits to subjective naturalness indicate the existence of a prior-independent upper bound on the pseudoscalar Higgs boson mass $m_A$ as a function of $\tan \beta$, the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the MSSM Higgs doublets. For a 30-parameter MSSM this implies that $m_A \lesssim 3$ TeV and $\tan \beta \lesssim 25$ at 95\% Bayesian confidence. Removing the contradictory subjectiveness within the electroweak fine-tuning measure leads to finding the naturalness line, $m_A \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \, m_Z \, \tan \beta,$ that reduces by one the number of MSSM Higgs sector free parameters.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Symbolic Classification-Enabled LHC Limits Online BSM Global Fits
Symbolic regression produces an approximate classifier for LHC exclusion limits that enables their direct inclusion during pMSSM global fits.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.