Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Data-driven Sequential Monte Carlo in Probabilistic Programming

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1512.04387 v2 pith:VDJBZFJ5 submitted 2015-12-14 cs.AI stat.APstat.ML

Data-driven Sequential Monte Carlo in Probabilistic Programming

classification cs.AI stat.APstat.ML
keywords carlodata-drivenmodelmonteprobabilisticprogrammingproposalinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) algorithms in existing probabilistic programming systems suboptimally use only model priors as proposal distributions. In this work, we describe an approach for training a discriminative model, namely a neural network, in order to approximate the optimal proposal by using posterior estimates from previous runs of inference. We show an example that incorporates a data-driven proposal for use in a non-parametric model in the Anglican probabilistic programming system. Our results show that data-driven proposals can significantly improve inference performance so that considerably fewer particles are necessary to perform a good posterior estimation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NeSyFS: A Neuro-symbolic Fast-Slow Thinking Framework for LLM Agent under Partial Observability

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Combining a knowledge-graph belief state, KG-augmented reflection, and TSMC-style particle planning lifts LLM agent success rates by roughly 30-95% over ReAct/Reflexion baselines on three benchmarks.