REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding Probabilistic Sparse Gaussian Process Approximations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Good sparse approximations are essential for practical inference in Gaussian Processes as the computational cost of exact methods is prohibitive for large datasets. The Fully Independent Training Conditional (FITC) and the Variational Free Energy (VFE) approximations are two recent popular methods. Despite superficial similarities, these approximations have surprisingly different theoretical properties and behave differently in practice. We thoroughly investigate the two methods for regression both analytically and through illustrative examples, and draw conclusions to guide practical application.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Machine-learnt potential highlights melting and freezing of aluminium nanoparticles
A new Bayesian force field for aluminium predicts icosahedral nanoparticle stability up to ~2,000 atoms, decahedral stability up to ~25,000 atoms, and fcc beyond, with melting/freezing hysteresis at 100 K/ns.
-
Evaluating Uncertainty in Deep Gaussian Processes
DSPPs achieve the best in-distribution calibration, but deep ensembles are more robust to synthetic feature shifts than either deep GP method.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.