Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Parallel SGD: When does averaging help?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.07365 v1 pith:5FMZ35GA submitted 2016-06-23 stat.ML cs.LG

Parallel SGD: When does averaging help?

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords averagingbenefitdatadependsobjectivesaffectscommoncomplement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Consider a number of workers running SGD independently on the same pool of data and averaging the models every once in a while -- a common but not well understood practice. We study model averaging as a variance-reducing mechanism and describe two ways in which the frequency of averaging affects convergence. For convex objectives, we show the benefit of frequent averaging depends on the gradient variance envelope. For non-convex objectives, we illustrate that this benefit depends on the presence of multiple globally optimal points. We complement our findings with multicore experiments on both synthetic and real data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What's in a Smoothness Constant? Tighter Rates for Local SGD with Bounded Second-order Heterogeneity

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Local SGD provably improves over Mini-batch SGD under bounded second-order heterogeneity in the general convex setting, with nearly tight upper and lower bounds.