Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Zig-Zag Process and Super-Efficient Sampling for Bayesian Analysis of Big Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1607.03188 v2 pith:AIRRQBIU submitted 2016-07-11 stat.CO math.PR

The Zig-Zag Process and Super-Efficient Sampling for Bayesian Analysis of Big Data

classification stat.CO math.PR
keywords processzig-zagapproximatedatadistributionmcmcmethodsposterior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Standard MCMC methods can scale poorly to big data settings due to the need to evaluate the likelihood at each iteration. There have been a number of approximate MCMC algorithms that use sub-sampling ideas to reduce this computational burden, but with the drawback that these algorithms no longer target the true posterior distribution. We introduce a new family of Monte Carlo methods based upon a multi-dimensional version of the Zig-Zag process of (Bierkens, Roberts, 2017), a continuous time piecewise deterministic Markov process. While traditional MCMC methods are reversible by construction (a property which is known to inhibit rapid convergence) the Zig-Zag process offers a flexible non-reversible alternative which we observe to often have favourable convergence properties. We show how the Zig-Zag process can be simulated without discretisation error, and give conditions for the process to be ergodic. Most importantly, we introduce a sub-sampling version of the Zig-Zag process that is an example of an {\em exact approximate scheme}, i.e. the resulting approximate process still has the posterior as its stationary distribution. Furthermore, if we use a control-variate idea to reduce the variance of our unbiased estimator, then the Zig-Zag process can be super-efficient: after an initial pre-processing step, essentially independent samples from the posterior distribution are obtained at a computational cost which does not depend on the size of the data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. State-of-art minibatches via novel DPP kernels: discretization, wavelets, and rough objectives

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Wavelet DPP kernels deliver improved continuous variance reduction and a discretization procedure that preserves decay rates for discrete ML subsampling tasks including rough objectives.

  2. The Ray Tracing Sampler: Bayesian Sampling of Neural Networks for Everyone

    astro-ph.IM 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    A new ray-tracing MCMC sampler keeps ray speed constant, making it far more robust to stochastic gradients and able to sample billion-parameter neural networks on one GPU.