Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Systematic uncertainties in long-baseline neutrino-oscillation experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1609.00258 v3 pith:GVFOIINT submitted 2016-09-01 hep-ph hep-ex

Systematic uncertainties in long-baseline neutrino-oscillation experiments

classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords uncertaintiesdetectoreffectsexperimentsneutrino-oscillationnuclearsystematicthose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Future neutrino-oscillation experiments are expected to bring definite answers to the questions of neutrino-mass hierarchy and violation of charge-parity symmetry in the lepton sector. To realize this ambitious program it is necessary to ensure a significant reduction of uncertainties, particularly those related to neutrino-energy reconstruction. In this paper, we discuss different sources of systematic uncertainties, paying special attention to those arising from nuclear effects and detector response. By analyzing nuclear effects we show the importance of developing accurate theoretical models, capable to provide quantitative description of neutrino cross sections, together with the relevance of their implementation in Monte Carlo generators and extensive testing against lepton-scattering data. We also point out the fundamental role of efforts aiming to determine detector responses in test-beam exposures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Flow-Based Surrogates for High-Dimensional Likelihoods in Experimental Neutrino Physics

    hep-ex 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    A hybrid coupling-plus-autoregressive normalizing flow reproduces a 110-parameter non-Gaussian near-detector likelihood at 98% relative ESS versus ~5% for the post-fit Gaussian, matching MCMC while remaining evaluable...

  2. Flow-Based Surrogates for High-Dimensional Likelihoods in Experimental Neutrino Physics

    hep-ex 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    A hybrid coupling-plus-autoregressive normalizing flow trained on a 110-parameter T2K-like near-detector likelihood reaches 98% relative ESS versus 5% for the post-fit Gaussian and matches MCMC flux predictions.

  3. CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation: Reviewing the Role of Neutrino Interaction Model Uncertainties on Accelerator-Based Neutrino Oscillation Measurements

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Neutrino interaction model uncertainties from nuclear physics details remain a dominant systematic in oscillation analyses and will require improved modeling plus near-detector constraints to reach the precision goals...