Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtasks
read the original abstract
As the body of research on abusive language detection and analysis grows, there is a need for critical consideration of the relationships between different subtasks that have been grouped under this label. Based on work on hate speech, cyberbullying, and online abuse we propose a typology that captures central similarities and differences between subtasks and we discuss its implications for data annotation and feature construction. We emphasize the practical actions that can be taken by researchers to best approach their abusive language detection subtask of interest.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Assisted Counterspeech Writing at the Crossroads of Hate Speech and Misinformation
LLMs generate adequate counterspeech for co-occurring hate and misinformation in 40% of cases, with a mixed knowledge strategy from fact-checkers and NGOs proving most effective after expert revision.
-
Context-Aware Detection and Victim-Centered Response Generation for Online Harassment in Private Messaging
A cascading LLM system detects context-dependent harassment in 80k private adolescent Instagram messages and produces victim-centered responses rated significantly more helpful than original replies by human evaluators.
-
Toxic Memes: A Survey of Computational Perspectives on the Detection and Explanation of Meme Toxicities
A PRISMA-based survey of 158 computational works on toxic meme detection introduces a new toxicity taxonomy and a framework linking target, intent, and conveyance tactics while noting trends in LLMs and cross-modal methods.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.