REVIEW 4 cited by
Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomization
read the original abstract
Convolutional neural networks have demonstrated high accuracy on various tasks in recent years. However, they are extremely vulnerable to adversarial examples. For example, imperceptible perturbations added to clean images can cause convolutional neural networks to fail. In this paper, we propose to utilize randomization at inference time to mitigate adversarial effects. Specifically, we use two randomization operations: random resizing, which resizes the input images to a random size, and random padding, which pads zeros around the input images in a random manner. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed randomization method is very effective at defending against both single-step and iterative attacks. Our method provides the following advantages: 1) no additional training or fine-tuning, 2) very few additional computations, 3) compatible with other adversarial defense methods. By combining the proposed randomization method with an adversarially trained model, it achieves a normalized score of 0.924 (ranked No.2 among 107 defense teams) in the NIPS 2017 adversarial examples defense challenge, which is far better than using adversarial training alone with a normalized score of 0.773 (ranked No.56). The code is public available at https://github.com/cihangxie/NIPS2017_adv_challenge_defense.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots
The authors build a safety-centered benchmark and attack method that induces vision-language-action robot policies to violate ISO-based safety rules in a majority of tested episodes.
-
Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive
DPOP is a new loss function that prevents DPO from lowering preferred response likelihoods and outperforms standard DPO on diverse datasets, MT-Bench, and enables Smaug-72B to exceed 80% on the Open LLM Leaderboard.
-
Theory of Continual Learning Against Data Poisoning Attacks
Establishes that no defense works against linear-proportion poisoning with unbounded noise in regularization-based continual learning and proposes verification and robust defenses for infrequent or bounded attacks.
-
Generating Transferrable Adversarial Examples via Local Mixing and Logits Optimization for Remote Sensing Object Recognition
A local-mixing and logit-optimization attack improves transferability of adversarial examples for remote sensing object recognition, outperforming 12 prior methods on two benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.