pith. sign in

arxiv: 1801.04016 · v1 · pith:4R7GD344new · submitted 2018-01-11 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· stat.ML

Theoretical Impediments to Machine Learning With Seven Sparks from the Causal Revolution

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML
keywords learningcausalmachinesystemscannotcurrentseventasks
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Current machine learning systems operate, almost exclusively, in a statistical, or model-free mode, which entails severe theoretical limits on their power and performance. Such systems cannot reason about interventions and retrospection and, therefore, cannot serve as the basis for strong AI. To achieve human level intelligence, learning machines need the guidance of a model of reality, similar to the ones used in causal inference tasks. To demonstrate the essential role of such models, I will present a summary of seven tasks which are beyond reach of current machine learning systems and which have been accomplished using the tools of causal modeling.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Counterfactual Explanation Framework for Retrieval Models

    cs.IR 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces a counterfactual method to explain low document rankings in retrieval models by finding terms whose addition would improve the rank.

  2. Formulating causal questions and principled statistical answers

    stat.ME 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Tutorial that phrases causal questions for point exposures, defines effects via potential outcomes, classifies estimation methods by confounding assumptions, and illustrates with a breastfeeding simulation learner.