pith. sign in

arxiv: 1801.04868 · v1 · pith:5ILMTGIBnew · submitted 2018-01-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.EP· physics.pop-ph

SETI is Part of Astrobiology

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EPphysics.pop-ph
keywords astrobiologysetinasapartarguefieldlifepractitioners
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

"Traditional SETI is not part of astrobiology" declares the NASA Astrobiology Strategy 2015 document. This is incorrect. In this white paper, I argue that SETI$-$seen as the search for technosignatures characteristic of the future of life in the universe$-$is a neglected complement to the search for biosignatures in NASA's astrobiology portfolio, and may offer the more fruitful avenue to the discovery of life elsewhere in the universe, as recognized by the Astro2010 decadal survey. I rebut six erroneous perceptions that may contribute to the field's absence from NASA's astrobiology strategy, and argue that since SETI is, quite obviously, part of astrobiology, SETI practitioners should at the very least be expressly encouraged to compete on a level playing field with practitioners of other subfields for NASA astrobiology resources.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Searches for Technosignatures in Astronomy and Astrophysics

    astro-ph.IM 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Advocates for technosignature searches as a compelling theme in the Astro2020 Decadal Survey, citing advances in astrobiology and technology despite past limited support.