Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

PU-Net: Point Cloud Upsampling Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1801.06761 v2 pith:TPVWGG6L submitted 2018-01-21 cs.CV cs.GR

PU-Net: Point Cloud Upsampling Network

classification cs.CV cs.GR
keywords pointupsampledclouddatafeaturefeaturesmethodnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning and analyzing 3D point clouds with deep networks is challenging due to the sparseness and irregularity of the data. In this paper, we present a data-driven point cloud upsampling technique. The key idea is to learn multi-level features per point and expand the point set via a multi-branch convolution unit implicitly in feature space. The expanded feature is then split to a multitude of features, which are then reconstructed to an upsampled point set. Our network is applied at a patch-level, with a joint loss function that encourages the upsampled points to remain on the underlying surface with a uniform distribution. We conduct various experiments using synthesis and scan data to evaluate our method and demonstrate its superiority over some baseline methods and an optimization-based method. Results show that our upsampled points have better uniformity and are located closer to the underlying surfaces.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI Can Learn Scientific Taste

    cs.CL 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Reinforcement learning on citation-preference pairs teaches a model to predict which papers will be cited more and to propose ideas that LLM judges rate as likely to be cited more—but "taste" here means citation impact.