Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hadron Spectra, Decays and Scattering Properties within Basis Light Front Quantization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.07865 v1 pith:6RCAUKW2 submitted 2018-04-20 nucl-th

Hadron Spectra, Decays and Scattering Properties within Basis Light Front Quantization

James P. Vary , Lekha Adhikari , Guangyao Chen , Shaoyang Jia , Meijian Li , Yang Li , Pieter Maris , Wenyang Qian
show 5 more authors
John R. Spence Shuo Tang Kirill Tuchin Anji Yu Xingbo Zhao
This is my paper
classification nucl-th
keywords basisblfqfrontlightpropertiesquantizationscatteringapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We survey recent progress in calculating properties of the electron and hadrons within the Basis Light Front Quantization (BLFQ) approach. We include applications to electromagnetic and strong scattering processes in relativistic heavy ion collisions. We present an initial investigation into the glueball states by applying BLFQ with multigluon sectors, introducing future research possibilities on multi-quark and multi-gluon systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Heavy Quarkonium Spectrum and Decay Constants from a Neural-Network-Based Holographic Model

    hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    A neural-network-parametrized dilaton field reproduces the masses and leptonic decay constants of charmonium and bottomonium with 1.26% and 3.32% RMS errors, but only because those values were used as training data.