pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1807.07909 · v1 · submitted 2018-07-20 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Recognition: unknown

Boosting algorithms for uplift modeling

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords upliftactionboostingmodelingthreealgorithmsbeengiven
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Uplift modeling is an area of machine learning which aims at predicting the causal effect of some action on a given individual. The action may be a medical procedure, marketing campaign, or any other circumstance controlled by the experimenter. Building an uplift model requires two training sets: the treatment group, where individuals have been subject to the action, and the control group, where no action has been performed. An uplift model allows then to assess the gain resulting from taking the action on a given individual, such as the increase in probability of patient recovery or of a product being purchased. This paper describes an adaptation of the well-known boosting techniques to the uplift modeling case. We formulate three desirable properties which an uplift boosting algorithm should have. Since all three properties cannot be satisfied simultaneously, we propose three uplift boosting algorithms, each satisfying two of them. Experiments demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed methods, which often dramatically improve performance of the base models and are thus new and powerful tools for uplift modeling.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Real vs. Semi-Simulated: Rethinking Evaluation for Treatment Effect Estimation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Counterfactual metrics on semi-simulated benchmarks fail to identify the treatment effect estimators preferred by observable metrics on real datasets, with simple meta-learners outperforming specialized causal models.