Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Black Hole - Galaxy Scaling Relationships for Active Galactic Nuclei with Reverberation Masses

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.01329 v2 pith:BK4HEHZQ submitted 2018-08-03 astro-ph.GA

Black Hole - Galaxy Scaling Relationships for Active Galactic Nuclei with Reverberation Masses

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords relationshipsblackgalaxiesgalaxyholeagreementclearfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We have utilized high-resolution optical Hubble Space Telescope images and deep, ground-based near-infrared images to examine the host-galaxies of 37 active galactic nuclei with reverberation-based black hole masses. Using two-dimensional image decompositions, we have separated the host galaxy from the bright central AGN, allowing a re-examination of the MBH-Lbulge and MBH-Lgalaxy relationships and the MBH-Mbulge and MBH-Mstars relationships using V-H color to constrain the stellar mass-to-light ratio. We find clear correlations for all of these scaling relationships, and the best-fit correlations are generally in good agreement with the sample of early-type galaxies with MBH from dynamical modeling and the sample of megamasers. We also find good agreement with the expectations from the Illustris simulations, although the agreement with other simulations is less clear because of the different black hole mass ranges that are probed. MBH-Lbulge is found to have the least scatter, and is therefore the best predictor of MBH among the relationships examined here. Large photometric surveys that rely on automated analysis and forego bulge-to-disk decompositions will achieve more accurate MBH predictions if they rely on MBH-Mstars rather than MBH-Lgalaxy. Finally, we have examined MBH/Mstars and find a clear trend with black hole mass but not galaxy mass. This same trend is also exhibited by galaxies with MBH from dynamical modeling and megamaser galaxies, as well as simulated galaxies from Illustris, rising from ~0.01% at 10^6 Msun to ~1.0% at 10^10 Msun. This scaling should be taken into account when comparing galaxy samples that are not matched in MBH.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AGN Feedback Models and AGN Demographics II: Comparing Predictions of Radiative and Total Feedback to Observations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    EAGLE, SIMBA, and TNG100 all fail to reproduce observed trends in which galaxies host radiatively efficient AGN, and EAGLE matches only after a factor-of-ten normalization adjustment.