Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machines that test Software like Humans

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.09455 v1 pith:E4ZGOSDG submitted 2018-09-25 cs.SE

Machines that test Software like Humans

classification cs.SE
keywords testautomationtestingscriptssoftwareapproachelementmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated software testing involves the execution of test scripts by a machine instead of being manually run. This significantly reduces the amount of manual time & effort needed and thus is of great interest to the software testing industry. There have been various tools developed to automate the testing of web applications (e.g. Selenium WebDriver); however, the practical adoption of test automation is still miniscule. This is due to the complexity of creating and maintaining automation scripts. The key problem with the existing methods is that the automation test scripts require certain implementation specifics of the Application Under Test (AUT) (e.g. the html code of a web element, or an image of a web element). On the other hand, if we look at the way manual testing is done, the tester interprets the textual test scripts and interacts with the AUT purely based on what he perceives visually through the GUI. In this paper, we present an approach to build a machine that can mimic human behavior for software testing using recent advances in Computer Vision. We also present four use-cases of how this approach can significantly advance the test automation space making test automation simple enough to be adopted practically.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Plover: Steering GUI Agents through Plan-Centric Interaction

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    An expert repairing visible plans rescued 23 of 26 failed GUI automation runs, turning 17 into full and 6 into partial successes.