pith. sign in

arxiv: 1810.01989 · v1 · pith:I7L32DBUnew · submitted 2018-10-03 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.LG

Verification for Machine Learning, Autonomy, and Neural Networks Survey

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.LG
keywords learninglecssurveyverificationapproachesautonomousautonomyformal
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This survey presents an overview of verification techniques for autonomous systems, with a focus on safety-critical autonomous cyber-physical systems (CPS) and subcomponents thereof. Autonomy in CPS is enabling by recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) through approaches such as deep neural networks (DNNs), embedded in so-called learning enabled components (LECs) that accomplish tasks from classification to control. Recently, the formal methods and formal verification community has developed methods to characterize behaviors in these LECs with eventual goals of formally verifying specifications for LECs, and this article presents a survey of many of these recent approaches.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Forecasting remaining useful life: Interpretable deep learning approach via variational Bayesian inferences

    cs.LG 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Structured-effect neural network with variational Bayesian inference predicts remaining useful life while claiming both accuracy and interpretability, evaluated on aircraft engine failure data.