Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Reasoning about Parallel Quantum Programs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.11334 v2 pith:PRJXAFTX submitted 2018-10-26 cs.LO cs.PLquant-ph

Reasoning about Parallel Quantum Programs

classification cs.LO cs.PLquant-ph
keywords quantumparallelprogramsproofcorrectnessrulescomponentoperational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We initiate the study of parallel quantum programming by defining the operational and denotational semantics of parallel quantum programs. The technical contributions of this paper include: (1) find a series of useful proof rules for reasoning about correctness of parallel quantum programs; (2) prove a (relative) completeness of our proof rules for partial correctness of disjoint parallel quantum programs; and (3) prove a strong soundness theorem of the proof rules showing that partial correctness is well maintained at each step of transitions in the operational semantics of a general parallel quantum program (with shared variables). This is achieved by partially overcoming the following conceptual challenges that are never present in classical parallel programming: (i) the intertwining of nondeterminism caused by quantum measurements and introduced by parallelism; (ii) entanglement between component quantum programs; and (iii) combining quantum predicates in the overlap of state Hilbert spaces of component quantum programs with shared variables. Applications of the techniques developed in this paper are illustrated by a formal verification of Bravyi-Gosset-K\"onig's parallel quantum algorithm solving a linear algebra problem, which gives for the first time an unconditional proof of a computational quantum advantage.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reasoning about Continuous-Variable Quantum Systems

    cs.LO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A cost-parametric quantum Hoare logic with continuous-outcome bind is proved sound and relatively complete over closed positive quadratic-form predicates, with case studies on a null-recurrent quantum walk and one-rou...

  2. A Practical Quantum Hoare Logic with Classical Variables, I

    cs.PL 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Presents a Hoare logic for quantum programs with classical variables using paired classical first-order formulas and quantum predicates, plus a simplified proof system with minimal modifications to classical Hoare logic.