pith. sign in

arxiv: 1812.02911 · v1 · pith:YNNKWBUNnew · submitted 2018-12-07 · 🧬 q-bio.QM · physics.bio-ph· physics.data-an

Accelerated Bayesian inference of gene expression models from snapshots of single-cell transcripts

classification 🧬 q-bio.QM physics.bio-phphysics.data-an
keywords bayesianmodelmodelsdataexpressiongeneinferencekinetic
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Understanding how stochastic gene expression is regulated in biological systems using snapshots of single-cell transcripts requires state-of-the-art methods of computational analysis and statistical inference. A Bayesian approach to statistical inference is the most complete method for model selection and uncertainty quantification of kinetic parameters from single-cell data. This approach is impractical because current numerical algorithms are too slow to handle typical models of gene expression. To solve this problem, we first show that time-dependent mRNA distributions of discrete-state models of gene expression are dynamic Poisson mixtures, whose mixing kernels are characterized by a piece-wise deterministic Markov process. We combined this analytical result with a kinetic Monte Carlo algorithm to create a hybrid numerical method that accelerates the calculation of time-dependent mRNA distributions by 1000-fold compared to current methods. We then integrated the hybrid algorithm into an existing Monte Carlo sampler to estimate the Bayesian posterior distribution of many different, competing models in a reasonable amount of time. We validated our method of accelerated Bayesian inference on several synthetic data sets. Our results show that kinetic parameters can be reasonably constrained for modestly sampled data sets, if the model is known \textit{a priori}. If the model is unknown,the Bayesian evidence can be used to rigorously quantify the likelihood of a model relative to other models from the data. We demonstrate that Bayesian evidence selects the true model and outperforms approximate metrics, e.g., Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) or Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), often used for model selection.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification for Systems Biology Models

    q-bio.QM 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Review of gradient-based and gradient-free methods for parameter point estimation plus profile likelihood, bootstrapping, and Bayesian inference for uncertainty quantification in systems biology models.