Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On-shell versus Off-shell Equivalence in 3D Gravity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.09205 v2 pith:FNGQFS6J submitted 2018-12-21 hep-th

On-shell versus Off-shell Equivalence in 3D Gravity

classification hep-th
keywords fieldequivalentgravityequationsmassiveoff-shellon-shellthey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A given field theory action determines a set of field equations but other actions may yield equivalent field equations; if so they are on-shell equivalent. They may also be off-shell equivalent, being related by the elimination of auxiliary fields or by local field redefinitions, but this is not guaranteed, as we demonstrate by consideration of the linearized limit of 3D massive gravity models. Failure to appreciate this subtlety has led to incorrect conclusions in recent studies of the "Minimal Massive Gravity" model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Chern-Simons-like formulation of 3D MMG-like massive gravity models

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    The simplest MMG-like third-way gravity model has unavoidable ghosts/tachyons, and at a chiral degenerate point its mass operator forms a rank-3 Jordan block, suggesting an ultra-logarithmic dual CFT.