Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Incremental Learning with Maximum Entropy Regularization: Rethinking Forgetting and Intransigence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.00829 v1 pith:C73A3BZ2 submitted 2019-02-03 cs.LG stat.ML

Incremental Learning with Maximum Entropy Regularization: Rethinking Forgetting and Intransigence

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords knowledgelearningforgettingincrementalintransigencemetricsuncertainaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Incremental learning suffers from two challenging problems; forgetting of old knowledge and intransigence on learning new knowledge. Prediction by the model incrementally learned with a subset of the dataset are thus uncertain and the uncertainty accumulates through the tasks by knowledge transfer. To prevent overfitting to the uncertain knowledge, we propose to penalize confident fitting to the uncertain knowledge by the Maximum Entropy Regularizer (MER). Additionally, to reduce class imbalance and induce a self-paced curriculum on new classes, we exclude a few samples from the new classes in every mini-batch, which we call DropOut Sampling (DOS). We further rethink evaluation metrics for forgetting and intransigence in incremental learning by tracking each sample's confusion at the transition of a task since the existing metrics that compute the difference in accuracy are often misleading. We show that the proposed method, named 'MEDIC', outperforms the state-of-the-art incremental learning algorithms in accuracy, forgetting, and intransigence measured by both the existing and the proposed metrics by a large margin in extensive empirical validations on CIFAR100 and a popular subset of ImageNet dataset (TinyImageNet).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Online Clustering of Seafloor Imagery for Interpretation during Long-Term AUV Operations

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    An online clustering framework with dynamic cluster splitting/merging and fixed-size representative sampling achieves about 0.68 average F1 on three seafloor image datasets with bounded runtime.