Recognition: unknown
On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders
read the original abstract
The Word Embedding Association Test shows that GloVe and word2vec word embeddings exhibit human-like implicit biases based on gender, race, and other social constructs (Caliskan et al., 2017). Meanwhile, research on learning reusable text representations has begun to explore sentence-level texts, with some sentence encoders seeing enthusiastic adoption. Accordingly, we extend the Word Embedding Association Test to measure bias in sentence encoders. We then test several sentence encoders, including state-of-the-art methods such as ELMo and BERT, for the social biases studied in prior work and two important biases that are difficult or impossible to test at the word level. We observe mixed results including suspicious patterns of sensitivity that suggest the test's assumptions may not hold in general. We conclude by proposing directions for future work on measuring bias in sentence encoders.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks
Sentence-BERT adapts BERT with siamese and triplet networks to produce sentence embeddings for efficient cosine-similarity comparisons, cutting computation time from hours to seconds on similarity search while matchin...
-
LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications
LaMDA shows that fine-tuning on human-value annotations and consulting external knowledge sources significantly improves safety and factual grounding in large dialog models beyond what scaling alone achieves.
-
Galactica: A Large Language Model for Science
Galactica, a science-specialized LLM, reports higher scores than GPT-3, Chinchilla, and PaLM on LaTeX knowledge, mathematical reasoning, and medical QA benchmarks while outperforming general models on BIG-bench.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.