pith. sign in

arxiv: 1904.05801 · v2 · pith:GFMGCJMDnew · submitted 2019-04-11 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Bridging Theory and Algorithm for Domain Adaptation

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords domainadaptationalgorithmtheorymarginadversarialbridginglearning
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper addresses the problem of unsupervised domain adaption from theoretical and algorithmic perspectives. Existing domain adaptation theories naturally imply minimax optimization algorithms, which connect well with the domain adaptation methods based on adversarial learning. However, several disconnections still exist and form the gap between theory and algorithm. We extend previous theories (Mansour et al., 2009c; Ben-David et al., 2010) to multiclass classification in domain adaptation, where classifiers based on the scoring functions and margin loss are standard choices in algorithm design. We introduce Margin Disparity Discrepancy, a novel measurement with rigorous generalization bounds, tailored to the distribution comparison with the asymmetric margin loss, and to the minimax optimization for easier training. Our theory can be seamlessly transformed into an adversarial learning algorithm for domain adaptation, successfully bridging the gap between theory and algorithm. A series of empirical studies show that our algorithm achieves the state of the art accuracies on challenging domain adaptation tasks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PGUDA: Pressure-Guided Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation for sEMG-Based Gesture Recognition

    eess.SP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PGUDA uses pressure signals to train a teacher network that distills modality-invariant knowledge into an sEMG student via cross-modal distillation, reaching 58.08% cross-subject accuracy with only 5% labeled data for...