Recognition: unknown
The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Development
read the original abstract
In this paper, we argue that competitive pressures could incentivize AI companies to underinvest in ensuring their systems are safe, secure, and have a positive social impact. Ensuring that AI systems are developed responsibly may therefore require preventing and solving collective action problems between companies. We note that there are several key factors that improve the prospects for cooperation in collective action problems. We use this to identify strategies to improve the prospects for industry cooperation on the responsible development of AI.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Why Open Source? A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the AI Race
A game-theoretic R&D race model shows that pure Nash equilibria for open-sourcing decisions exist and are computationally tractable in both discrete and continuous settings.
-
Racing to Release: Priority, Congestion, and Community Recognition in Open-Source LLM Ecosystems
Later derivative LLM releases and those in more crowded competitive environments on Hugging Face receive weaker community recognition.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.