REVIEW 1 cited by
Gradient flows and proximal splitting methods: A unified view on accelerated and stochastic optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Gradient flows and proximal splitting methods: A unified view on accelerated and stochastic optimization
read the original abstract
Optimization is at the heart of machine learning, statistics and many applied scientific disciplines. It also has a long history in physics, ranging from the minimal action principle to finding ground states of disordered systems such as spin glasses. Proximal algorithms form a class of methods that are broadly applicable and are particularly well-suited to nonsmooth, constrained, large-scale, and distributed optimization problems. There are essentially five proximal algorithms currently known: Forward-backward splitting, Tseng splitting, Douglas-Rachford, alternating direction method of multipliers, and the more recent Davis-Yin. These methods sit on a higher level of abstraction compared to gradient-based ones, with deep roots in nonlinear functional analysis. We show that all of these methods are actually different discretizations of a single differential equation, namely, the simple gradient flow which dates back to Cauchy (1847). An important aspect behind many of the success stories in machine learning relies on "accelerating" the convergence of first-order methods. We show that similar discretization schemes applied to Newton's equation with an additional dissipative force, which we refer to as accelerated gradient flow, allow us to obtain accelerated variants of all these proximal algorithms -- the majority of which are new although some recover known cases in the literature. Furthermore, we extend these methods to stochastic settings, allowing us to make connections with Langevin and Fokker-Planck equations. Similar ideas apply to gradient descent, heavy ball, and Nesterov's method which are simpler. Our results therefore provide a unified framework from which several important optimization methods are nothing but simulations of classical dissipative systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Learning Gradient Flow: Using Equation Discovery to Accelerate Engineering Optimization
An optimizer that fits a SINDy polynomial model to recent optimization-variable trajectories and then integrates that surrogate flow instead of evaluating the true objective/gradient can cut gradient-evaluation counts...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.