REVIEW 1 cited by
Insider threats in Cyber Security: The enemy within the gates
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Insider threats have become reality for civilian firms such as Tesla, which experienced sabotage and intellectual property theft, and Capital One, which suffered from fraud. Even greater social impact was caused by the data breach at the US Department of Defense, perpetrated by well-known attackers Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, whose espionage and hacktivist activities are widely known. The dramatic increase of such incidents in recent years and the incalculable damage committed by insiders must serve as a warning for all members of the cyber security community. It is no longer acceptable to continue to underestimate the problem of insider threats. Firms, organizations, institutions and governments need to lead and embrace a cultural change in their security posture. Through the adoption of an Insider Threat Program that engages all the strategic branches (including HR, Legal, Information Assurance, Cyber Security and Intelligence), coordinated by the chief information security officer and supported by c-level executive, it is possible to implement a framework that can prevent, detect, and respond to disloyal and/or unintentional insider threats. Hence, defending your enterprise from insider threats is a vital part of information security best practices. It is essential that your company highly valuable classified data and assets are protected from its greatest threat: the enemy within the gates.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SimViews: An Interactive Multi-Agent System Simulating Visitor-to-Visitor Conversational Patterns to Present Diverse Perspectives of Artifacts in Virtual Museums
The body text belongs to a different paper (Chimera), so the abstract's SimViews claims and its 20-participant study are unsupported in the submitted text.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.