REVIEW 2 cited by
Benchmarking the Neural Linear Model for Regression
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Benchmarking the Neural Linear Model for Regression
read the original abstract
The neural linear model is a simple adaptive Bayesian linear regression method that has recently been used in a number of problems ranging from Bayesian optimization to reinforcement learning. Despite its apparent successes in these settings, to the best of our knowledge there has been no systematic exploration of its capabilities on simple regression tasks. In this work we characterize these on the UCI datasets, a popular benchmark for Bayesian regression models, as well as on the recently introduced UCI "gap" datasets, which are better tests of out-of-distribution uncertainty. We demonstrate that the neural linear model is a simple method that shows generally good performance on these tasks, but at the cost of requiring good hyperparameter tuning.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Prediction-Powered Active Testing
PPAT residualizes losses via a prediction-powered control variate inside LURE, yielding lower-variance unbiased risk estimates, tailored acquisition, and asymptotic CIs that cover with fewer labels.
-
Spectral methods: crucial for machine learning, natural for quantum computers?
Quantum computers may enable more natural manipulation of Fourier spectra in ML models via the Quantum Fourier Transform, potentially leading to resource-efficient spectral methods.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.