Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

(Mis)Information Operations: An Integrated Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.10795 v1 pith:ZLTZPMS7 submitted 2019-12-23 cs.CY cs.SI

(Mis)Information Operations: An Integrated Perspective

classification cs.CY cs.SI
keywords informationusersintegratedoperationscognitiveconsideredsocialthey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The massive diffusion of social media fosters disintermediation and changes the way users are informed, the way they process reality, and the way they engage in public debate. The cognitive layer of users and the related social dynamics define the nature and the dimension of informational threats. Users show the tendency to interact with information adhering to their preferred narrative and to ignore dissenting information. Confirmation bias seems to account for users decisions about consuming and spreading content; and, at the same time, aggregation of favored information within those communities reinforces group polarization. In this work, the authors address the problem of (mis)information operations with a holistic and integrated approach. Cognitive weakness induced by this new information environment are considered. Moreover, (mis)information operations, with particular reference to the Italian context, are considered; and the fact that the phenomenon is more complex than expected is highlighted. The paper concludes by providing an integrated research roadmap accounting for the possible future technological developments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. InfoOps Bench: A live information operations safety benchmark

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A live benchmark of 17 LLMs finds most will write propaganda posts for Russian, Chinese, or Iranian claims, with compliance from 8.8% to 94.5% and Chinese models' refusals driven partly by censorship.

  2. InfoOps Bench: A live information operations safety benchmark

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Most of 17 frontier models can be co-opted to promote live state-backed information-operation claims, with integrity from 8.8% to 94.5% and large China-specific filtering in several Chinese-developed models.