REVIEW 2 cited by
Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Need
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Need
read the original abstract
The lottery ticket hypothesis (Frankle and Carbin, 2018), states that a randomly-initialized network contains a small subnetwork such that, when trained in isolation, can compete with the performance of the original network. We prove an even stronger hypothesis (as was also conjectured in Ramanujan et al., 2019), showing that for every bounded distribution and every target network with bounded weights, a sufficiently over-parameterized neural network with random weights contains a subnetwork with roughly the same accuracy as the target network, without any further training.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Domain Adaptation of Mismatched Proximal Denoiser for Plug-and-Play Image Reconstruction
For PnP-PGD, residual reconstruction error is bounded by average squared mismatch between the deployed denoiser and the target proximal map, motivating proximal-matching few-shot adaptation that outperforms MSE adapta...
-
Double-Scoring: Reliable Extraction of Strong Lottery Tickets
Double-scoring replaces layerwise sparsity selection with fixed half-density masking over an augmented score tensor, yielding higher untrained-subnetwork accuracy but at uncontrolled effective sparsity.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.