Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.00817 v3 pith:76PZF6UK submitted 2020-02-03 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords messagesmodelusershufflecentralerrorlocalsummation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The shuffle model of differential privacy (Erlingsson et al. SODA 2019; Cheu et al. EUROCRYPT 2019) and its close relative encode-shuffle-analyze (Bittau et al. SOSP 2017) provide a fertile middle ground between the well-known local and central models. Similarly to the local model, the shuffle model assumes an untrusted data collector who receives privatized messages from users, but in this case a secure shuffler is used to transmit messages from users to the collector in a way that hides which messages came from which user. An interesting feature of the shuffle model is that increasing the amount of messages sent by each user can lead to protocols with accuracies comparable to the ones achievable in the central model. In particular, for the problem of privately computing the sum of $n$ bounded real values held by $n$ different users, Cheu et al. showed that $O(\sqrt{n})$ messages per user suffice to achieve $O(1)$ error (the optimal rate in the central model), while Balle et al. (CRYPTO 2019) recently showed that a single message per user leads to $\Theta(n^{1/3})$ MSE (mean squared error), a rate strictly in-between what is achievable in the local and central models. This paper introduces two new protocols for summation in the shuffle model with improved accuracy and communication trade-offs. Our first contribution is a recursive construction based on the protocol from Balle et al. mentioned above, providing $\mathrm{poly}(\log \log n)$ error with $O(\log \log n)$ messages per user. The second contribution is a protocol with $O(1)$ error and $O(1)$ messages per user based on a novel analysis of the reduction from secure summation to shuffling introduced by Ishai et al. (FOCS 2006) (the original reduction required $O(\log n)$ messages per user).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Power of Multiple Anonymous Messages

    cs.CR 2019-08 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Single-message shuffled-model frequency estimation has optimal error about min(n^{1/4}, sqrt(B)); multi-message protocols achieve polylogarithmic error with polylogarithmic communication.

  2. Improving Utility and Security of the Shuffler-based Differential Privacy

    cs.CR 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Local hashing with an optimized output size and a new encrypted oblivious-shuffle protocol improve utility and attack-resistance in shuffler-based differential privacy.

Pith tools