REVIEW 4 cited by
Knowledge-guided Deep Reinforcement Learning for Interactive Recommendation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Knowledge-guided Deep Reinforcement Learning for Interactive Recommendation
read the original abstract
Interactive recommendation aims to learn from dynamic interactions between items and users to achieve responsiveness and accuracy. Reinforcement learning is inherently advantageous for coping with dynamic environments and thus has attracted increasing attention in interactive recommendation research. Inspired by knowledge-aware recommendation, we proposed Knowledge-Guided deep Reinforcement learning (KGRL) to harness the advantages of both reinforcement learning and knowledge graphs for interactive recommendation. This model is implemented upon the actor-critic network framework. It maintains a local knowledge network to guide decision-making and employs the attention mechanism to capture long-term semantics between items. We have conducted comprehensive experiments in a simulated online environment with six public real-world datasets and demonstrated the superiority of our model over several state-of-the-art methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers
Moral judgments become more deontological when human design of AI is visible, and designers are judged more strictly than the AI or unaided humans, creating plural and non-converging targets for value alignment.
-
The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers
Survey experiment finds that people apply more deontological standards to AI described as human-programmed and to the programmers themselves than to unaided humans or unprogrammed robots in a moral dilemma.
-
The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers
People apply stricter, more rule-based moral standards to AI systems and their engineers when the AI's human programming is made explicit, while judging the same AI and a human actor similarly when programming is invisible.
-
The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers
People judge AI systems and their human designers with markedly more deontological constraints than they apply to humans or standalone robots in the same ethical scenario.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.