Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Tutorial and Literature Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.10240 v2 pith:5SUUKVC5 submitted 2020-04-21 cs.LG stat.ML

Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Tutorial and Literature Survey

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords forecastingdeepmethodsapplicationsblocksbuildinglearningliterature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning based forecasting methods have become the methods of choice in many applications of time series prediction or forecasting often outperforming other approaches. Consequently, over the last years, these methods are now ubiquitous in large-scale industrial forecasting applications and have consistently ranked among the best entries in forecasting competitions (e.g., M4 and M5). This practical success has further increased the academic interest to understand and improve deep forecasting methods. In this article we provide an introduction and overview of the field: We present important building blocks for deep forecasting in some depth; using these building blocks, we then survey the breadth of the recent deep forecasting literature.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probabilistic Residual Learning for Online Recommendations

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    PRL adds a cluster-aware, causality-adjusted residual correction layer to any base recommender, improving cold-start cross-domain recommendation accuracy in experiments.