REVIEW 1 cited by
Some people aren't worth listening to: periodically retraining classifiers with feedback from a team of end users
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Some people aren't worth listening to: periodically retraining classifiers with feedback from a team of end users
read the original abstract
Document classification is ubiquitous in a business setting, but often the end users of a classifier are engaged in an ongoing feedback-retrain loop with the team that maintain it. We consider this feedback-retrain loop from a multi-agent point of view, considering the end users as autonomous agents that provide feedback on the labelled data provided by the classifier. This allows us to examine the effect on the classifier's performance of unreliable end users who provide incorrect feedback. We demonstrate a classifier that can learn which users tend to be unreliable, filtering their feedback out of the loop, thus improving performance in subsequent iterations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Decoupling Variance and Scale-Invariant Updates in Adaptive Gradient Descent for Unified Vector and Matrix Optimization
DeVA_S8 reweights Muon's matrix-sign update in the matrix's eigenbasis with a singular-value signal-to-noise ratio, reaching target LLM validation perplexity with ~6.6% fewer tokens than Muon.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.