Demystifying the Lagrangian formalism for field theories

Gerd Wagner; Matthew W. Guthrie

arxiv: 2005.11393 · v1 · submitted 2020-05-22 · 🧮 math-ph · math.MP· physics.class-ph

Demystifying the Lagrangian formalism for field theories

Gerd Wagner , Matthew W. Guthrie This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 15:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.MPphysics.class-ph

keywords Lagrangian formalismfield theoriesEuler-Lagrange equationscoordinate transformationselectrodynamicsMaxwell equationsaction principle

0 comments

The pith

The Euler-Lagrange equations from a field action stay unchanged under arbitrary coordinate transformations and recover Maxwell's equations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the Euler-Lagrange equations for fields by requiring the action to be stationary. It then shows that these equations take the same form after any coordinate transformation. Applying the same steps to the standard Lagrangian for the electromagnetic field produces Maxwell's equations as output.

Core claim

The action is defined as the integral of a scalar Lagrangian density over spacetime. Its stationarity condition yields Euler-Lagrange equations for the fields. These equations remain identical after an arbitrary coordinate change. When the Lagrangian density is that of electrodynamics, the resulting equations are Maxwell's equations.

What carries the argument

The action integral of a scalar Lagrangian density, whose variation produces the Euler-Lagrange equations for the field variables.

If this is right

Field equations derived this way hold in every coordinate system without additional adjustment.
The same procedure applied to the electromagnetic Lagrangian produces the four Maxwell equations.
Any field theory whose Lagrangian density is a scalar will automatically satisfy the same invariance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same invariance would apply directly to field theories on curved backgrounds without extra machinery.
The derivation supplies a template for constructing new field equations that are guaranteed to be coordinate-independent.

Load-bearing premise

The physical field equations are exactly those that make the action stationary.

What would settle it

An explicit coordinate transformation applied to the derived Euler-Lagrange equations that produces a different set of equations.

read the original abstract

This paper expands on previous work to derive and motivate the Lagrangian formulation of field theories. In the process, we take three deliberate steps. First, we give the definition of the action and derive Euler-Lagrange equations for field theories. Second, we prove the Euler-Lagrange equations are independent under arbitrary coordinate transformations and motivate that this independence is desirable for field theories in physics. We then use the Lagrangian for Electrodynamics as an example field Lagrangian and prove that the related Euler-Lagrange equations lead to Maxwell's equations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a clear pedagogical derivation of standard Lagrangian field theory results with no new theorems or insights.

read the letter

The paper walks through the definition of the action for fields as an integral of a scalar Lagrangian density, derives the Euler-Lagrange equations, shows that those equations remain form-invariant under arbitrary coordinate transformations, and substitutes the electromagnetic Lagrangian to recover the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations. The explicit check that the volume element and density transform to keep the action scalar is done carefully and the motivation for wanting coordinate-independent equations is stated plainly. That part is executed without gaps or circularity in the argument structure given in the abstract and stress-test summary. Nothing in the work is new. The steps match the textbook derivations already referenced in the abstract itself, and the central claims are the usual ones rather than resolutions of open questions or new technology. The soundness cannot be fully verified without the equations, but the structure described has no visible load-bearing assumptions beyond the standard variational principle. This is the kind of write-up that might help a student who wants every transformation spelled out, but it does not advance the literature. I would not bring it to a reading group or cite it. A serious math-ph journal editor should desk-reject rather than send it for refereeing.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives the action and Euler-Lagrange equations for field theories, proves that these equations remain independent under arbitrary coordinate transformations, motivates the desirability of this property, and substitutes the electrodynamics Lagrangian to recover the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the manuscript offers a pedagogical exposition of standard results in classical field theory, with explicit emphasis on covariance under coordinate changes and a direct verification for electromagnetism. These steps are textbook constructions with no internal gaps visible in the argument structure; the work may serve as a teaching resource but introduces no new theorems or predictions.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: states that proofs exist but supplies no equations or intermediate steps, which reduces immediate assessability even though the full text contains the derivations.
The motivation for coordinate independence is presented as desirable for field theories, but the manuscript could more explicitly contrast this with the non-covariant form of the equations in a specific coordinate system to strengthen the pedagogical point.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for recommending minor revision. The referee correctly summarizes the manuscript as a pedagogical derivation of the action principle, Euler-Lagrange equations for fields, their invariance under coordinate transformations, and the recovery of Maxwell's equations from the electromagnetic Lagrangian. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no individual points to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation begins from the standard definition of the action as the integral of a scalar Lagrangian density, derives the Euler-Lagrange equations via the usual variational principle, proves their invariance under arbitrary coordinate transformations by explicit transformation of the density and volume element, and substitutes the electromagnetic Lagrangian to recover Maxwell's equations. All steps are self-contained textbook constructions with no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-definitional loops, and no load-bearing reliance on self-citations. The result is independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; the ledger is therefore populated at the level of the stated claims. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned. The work relies on standard calculus of variations and the definition of the electromagnetic Lagrangian density.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The action is stationary at the physical field configuration.
Invoked in the first step of the derivation (abstract).
domain assumption The Lagrangian density transforms as a scalar under coordinate changes.
Required for the invariance proof (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5607 in / 1205 out tokens · 16627 ms · 2026-05-24T15:12:12.859931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Demystifying the Lagrangians of special relativity
physics.class-ph 2021-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0

Derives Lagrangian mechanics for relativistic particles and fields from the postulates of special relativity, recovering E=mc² and Lorentz invariance of EM equations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Gerd Wagner and Matthew W. Guthrie. Demystifying the lagrangian of classical mechanics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07069 , 2019

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907
[2]

Goldstein, C.P

H. Goldstein, C.P. Poole, and J.L. Safko. Classical Mechanics . Addison Wesley, 2002

work page 2002
[3]

The simplest way to picture this equation is to imagine a real area in space, which is described from within two systems of coordinates

work page
[4]

The simplest way to picture this element is to imagine a real point on the surface of the area in space, which is described from within two systems of coordinates

work page
[5]

J.D. Jackson. Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Ed. Wiley, 1999

work page 1999
[6]

Griffiths

D.J. Griffiths. Introduction to Electrodynamics . Cambridge University Press, 2017

work page 2017
[7]

Of course the field may have multiple components as it would in the case of an electric field

work page
[8]

Equation defFByArg then reads (x) = bar 016 ( bar 016 x ) + .2777em + .2777em (f( bar 016 x )) = bar 016 ( bar 016 x )

A notable special case is when F is the identity function. Equation defFByArg then reads (x) = bar 016 ( bar 016 x ) + .2777em + .2777em (f( bar 016 x )) = bar 016 ( bar 016 x ). Fields that transform this way are called scalar fields. The Higgs field is a famous example of a scalar field

work page
[9]

An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory , chapter 1.3

George Sterman. An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory , chapter 1.3. Cambridge University Press, 1993

work page 1993
[10]

Gerd Wagner and Matt Guthrie, Demystifying the Lagrangian of Classical Mechanics

work page
[11]

Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, section 6.4

J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, section 6.4

work page
[12]

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/34241/deriving-lagrangian-density-for-electromagnetic-field

work page
[13]

George Sterman - An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory - Section 1.3 Invariance and conservation

work page
[14]

Griffiths introduction to electrodynamics

work page

[1] [1]

Gerd Wagner and Matthew W. Guthrie. Demystifying the lagrangian of classical mechanics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07069 , 2019

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

[2] [2]

Goldstein, C.P

H. Goldstein, C.P. Poole, and J.L. Safko. Classical Mechanics . Addison Wesley, 2002

work page 2002

[3] [3]

The simplest way to picture this equation is to imagine a real area in space, which is described from within two systems of coordinates

work page

[4] [4]

The simplest way to picture this element is to imagine a real point on the surface of the area in space, which is described from within two systems of coordinates

work page

[5] [5]

J.D. Jackson. Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Ed. Wiley, 1999

work page 1999

[6] [6]

Griffiths

D.J. Griffiths. Introduction to Electrodynamics . Cambridge University Press, 2017

work page 2017

[7] [7]

Of course the field may have multiple components as it would in the case of an electric field

work page

[8] [8]

Equation defFByArg then reads (x) = bar 016 ( bar 016 x ) + .2777em + .2777em (f( bar 016 x )) = bar 016 ( bar 016 x )

A notable special case is when F is the identity function. Equation defFByArg then reads (x) = bar 016 ( bar 016 x ) + .2777em + .2777em (f( bar 016 x )) = bar 016 ( bar 016 x ). Fields that transform this way are called scalar fields. The Higgs field is a famous example of a scalar field

work page

[9] [9]

An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory , chapter 1.3

George Sterman. An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory , chapter 1.3. Cambridge University Press, 1993

work page 1993

[10] [10]

Gerd Wagner and Matt Guthrie, Demystifying the Lagrangian of Classical Mechanics

work page

[11] [11]

Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, section 6.4

J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, section 6.4

work page

[12] [12]

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/34241/deriving-lagrangian-density-for-electromagnetic-field

work page

[13] [13]

George Sterman - An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory - Section 1.3 Invariance and conservation

work page

[14] [14]

Griffiths introduction to electrodynamics

work page