Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Quantitative Group Testing and the rank of random matrices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.09074 v1 pith:GUD6CYRX submitted 2020-06-16 cs.IT math.IT

Quantitative Group Testing and the rank of random matrices

classification cs.IT math.IT
keywords problemalgorithmssubsetselectrankconjecturegivengroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Given a random Bernoulli matrix $ A\in \{0,1\}^{m\times n} $, an integer $ 0< k < n $ and the vector $ y:=Ax $, where $ x \in \{0,1\}^n $ is of Hamming weight $ k $, the objective in the {\em Quantitative Group Testing} (QGT) problem is to recover $ x $. This problem is more difficult the smaller $m$ is. For parameter ranges of interest to us, known polynomial time algorithms require values of $m$ that are much larger than $k$. In this work, we define a seemingly easier problem that we refer to as {\em Subset Select}. Given the same input as in QGT, the objective in Subset Select is to return a subset $ S \subseteq [n] $ of cardinality $ m $, such that for all $ i\in [n] $, if $ x_i = 1 $ then $ i\in S $. We show that if the square submatrix of $A$ defined by the columns indexed by $S$ has nearly full rank, then from the solution of the Subset Select problem we can recover in polynomial-time the solution $x$ to the QGT problem. We conjecture that for every polynomial time Subset Select algorithm, the resulting output matrix will satisfy the desired rank condition. We prove the conjecture for some classes of algorithms. Using this reduction, we provide some examples of how to improve known QGT algorithms. Using theoretical analysis and simulations, we demonstrate that the modified algorithms solve the QGT problem for values of $ m $ that are smaller than those required for the original algorithms.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Group Testing with Selectable Thresholds

    cs.IT 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Selectable-threshold group testing achieves the counting-bound rate of 1 when thresholds are unbounded, and its fixed-threshold achievability and converse bounds meet as the defect-density exponent tends to 1.

  2. Learning to Ask: Decision Transformers for Adaptive Quantitative Group Testing

    cs.IT 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0

    An adaptive Decision Transformer policy, trained on heuristic-generated trajectories, is claimed to beat the non-adaptive query-count bound for quantitative group testing.