Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SenSeI: Sensitive Set Invariance for Enforcing Individual Fairness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.14168 v2 pith:VNNOKYIA submitted 2020-06-25 cs.LG stat.ML

SenSeI: Sensitive Set Invariance for Enforcing Individual Fairness

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords fairnessfairindividualenforcesinvariancelearningmachineregularizer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we cast fair machine learning as invariant machine learning. We first formulate a version of individual fairness that enforces invariance on certain sensitive sets. We then design a transport-based regularizer that enforces this version of individual fairness and develop an algorithm to minimize the regularizer efficiently. Our theoretical results guarantee the proposed approach trains certifiably fair ML models. Finally, in the experimental studies we demonstrate improved fairness metrics in comparison to several recent fair training procedures on three ML tasks that are susceptible to algorithmic bias.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Do Counterfactually Fair Image Classifiers Satisfy Group Fairness? -- A Theoretical and Empirical Study

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Counterfactually fair image classifiers need not satisfy group fairness when a latent attribute G correlates with the sensitive attribute; reducing reliance on G (via CKD) restores both.