REVIEW 2 cited by
DeepFakesON-Phys: DeepFakes Detection based on Heart Rate Estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
DeepFakesON-Phys: DeepFakes Detection based on Heart Rate Estimation
read the original abstract
This work introduces a novel DeepFake detection framework based on physiological measurement. In particular, we consider information related to the heart rate using remote photoplethysmography (rPPG). rPPG methods analyze video sequences looking for subtle color changes in the human skin, revealing the presence of human blood under the tissues. In this work we investigate to what extent rPPG is useful for the detection of DeepFake videos. The proposed fake detector named DeepFakesON-Phys uses a Convolutional Attention Network (CAN), which extracts spatial and temporal information from video frames, analyzing and combining both sources to better detect fake videos. This detection approach has been experimentally evaluated using the latest public databases in the field: Celeb-DF and DFDC. The results achieved, above 98% AUC (Area Under the Curve) on both databases, outperform the state of the art and prove the success of fake detectors based on physiological measurement to detect the latest DeepFake videos.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Detecting AI-Generated Video: A Vision-Language Dual-View Survey
AIGC-V detection should be treated as factual fidelity verification and organized by a four-layer vision-language dual-view taxonomy spanning cues, motion, cross-modal consistency, and world-level reasoning.
-
Physiological Signals as a Forensic Modality for Talking-Face Deepfake Detection
A classifier trained on rPPG waveforms from face videos detects talking-face deepfakes with AUC 0.806, and detection difficulty varies by generator (AUC 0.690–0.985).
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.