Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

X-FACTR: Multilingual Factual Knowledge Retrieval from Pretrained Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.06189 v3 pith:CZPZHJHE submitted 2020-10-13 cs.CL

X-FACTR: Multilingual Factual Knowledge Retrieval from Pretrained Language Models

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgelanguagesfactualbenchmarklanguagemultilingualabilitybeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models (LMs) have proven surprisingly successful at capturing factual knowledge by completing cloze-style fill-in-the-blank questions such as "Punta Cana is located in _." However, while knowledge is both written and queried in many languages, studies on LMs' factual representation ability have almost invariably been performed on English. To assess factual knowledge retrieval in LMs in different languages, we create a multilingual benchmark of cloze-style probes for 23 typologically diverse languages. To properly handle language variations, we expand probing methods from single- to multi-word entities, and develop several decoding algorithms to generate multi-token predictions. Extensive experimental results provide insights about how well (or poorly) current state-of-the-art LMs perform at this task in languages with more or fewer available resources. We further propose a code-switching-based method to improve the ability of multilingual LMs to access knowledge, and verify its effectiveness on several benchmark languages. Benchmark data and code have been released at https://x-factr.github.io.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rethinking Cross-lingual Gaps from a Statistical Viewpoint

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Cross-lingual accuracy gaps in LLMs are dominated by higher response variance in target languages, not missing knowledge; ensembling and variance-reduction prompts shrink the gap.

  2. BRoverbs -- Measuring how much LLMs understand Portuguese proverbs

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    BRoverbs lets researchers test whether language models understand Portuguese proverbs; commercial models nearly master it, small models often guess randomly.