Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.03082 v2 pith:JLKXHBN5 submitted 2020-12-05 cs.LG stat.ML

The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords uncertaintydistributionepistemicrepresentationslatentaleatoricdatahidden
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data. This work investigates whether this distribution moreover correlates with a model's epistemic uncertainty, thus indicates its ability to generalise to novel inputs. We first empirically verify that epistemic uncertainty can be identified with the surprise, thus the negative log-likelihood, of observing a particular latent representation. Moreover, we demonstrate that the output-conditional distribution of hidden representations also allows quantifying aleatoric uncertainty via the entropy of the predictive distribution. We analyse epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty inferred from the representations of different layers and conclude that deeper layers lead to uncertainty with similar behaviour as established - but computationally more expensive - methods (e.g. deep ensembles). While our approach does not require modifying the training process, we follow prior work and experiment with an additional regularising loss that increases the information in the latent representations. We find that this leads to improved OOD detection of epistemic uncertainty at the cost of ambiguous calibration close to the data distribution. We verify our findings on both classification and regression models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncertainty Quantification for Regression: A Unified Framework based on kernel scores

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    Kernel-score divergences define a unified family of regression uncertainty measures whose kernel choice controls robustness, tail sensitivity, and OOD responsiveness.