pith. sign in

arxiv: 2102.01564 · v1 · pith:M4FXWOW2new · submitted 2021-02-02 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS)

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords safetysystemsamlasassuranceautonomouslearningmachinecase
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Machine Learning (ML) is now used in a range of systems with results that are reported to exceed, under certain conditions, human performance. Many of these systems, in domains such as healthcare , automotive and manufacturing, exhibit high degrees of autonomy and are safety critical. Establishing justified confidence in ML forms a core part of the safety case for these systems. In this document we introduce a methodology for the Assurance of Machine Learning for use in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS). AMLAS comprises a set of safety case patterns and a process for (1) systematically integrating safety assurance into the development of ML components and (2) for generating the evidence base for explicitly justifying the acceptable safety of these components when integrated into autonomous system applications.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Output Type Before Quality: A Standards-Derived XAI Admissibility Rubric for Autonomous-Driving Safety

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A standards-derived rubric shows causal XAI is required for hazard identification, incident investigation, and data management in ADS safety cases, while other methods suffice elsewhere.

  2. Engineering Reliable Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Solutions

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A workshop report catalogues challenges and solution pathways for verification, engineering, and architecting reliable autonomous systems.