REVIEW 1 cited by
Benchmarking quantum co-processors in an application-centric, hardware-agnostic and scalable way
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Benchmarking quantum co-processors in an application-centric, hardware-agnostic and scalable way
read the original abstract
Existing protocols for benchmarking current quantum co-processors fail to meet the usual standards for assessing the performance of High-Performance-Computing platforms. After a synthetic review of these protocols -- whether at the gate, circuit or application level -- we introduce a new benchmark, dubbed Atos Q-score (TM), that is application-centric, hardware-agnostic and scalable to quantum advantage processor sizes and beyond. The Q-score measures the maximum number of qubits that can be used effectively to solve the MaxCut combinatorial optimization problem with the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. We give a robust definition of the notion of effective performance by introducing an improved approximation ratio based on the scaling of random and optimal algorithms. We illustrate the behavior of Q-score using perfect and noisy simulations of quantum processors. Finally, we provide an open-source implementation of Q-score that makes it easy to compute the Q-score of any quantum hardware.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quantum Fidelity-per-Cost: A Metric for Evaluation of Quantum Computing Systems
Cost-aware ranking of cloud QPUs via QFC disagrees with fidelity-only ranking; billing model, not hardware, fixes how the score scales with shot count.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.