Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Human-AI Symbiosis: A Survey of Current Approaches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.09990 v1 pith:CHMZ4NA4 submitted 2021-03-18 cs.AI

Human-AI Symbiosis: A Survey of Current Approaches

classification cs.AI
keywords human-aiworkssurveyteamaccordingapproachesareaaspects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In this paper, we aim at providing a comprehensive outline of the different threads of work in human-AI collaboration. By highlighting various aspects of works on the human-AI team such as the flow of complementing, task horizon, model representation, knowledge level, and teaming goal, we make a taxonomy of recent works according to these dimensions. We hope that the survey will provide a more clear connection between the works in the human-AI team and guidance to new researchers in this area.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Morality of Probability: How Implicit Moral Biases in LLMs May Shape the Future of Human-AI Symbiosis

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    Six large language models consistently rated care and virtue outcomes as most moral and libertarian outcomes as least moral across 54 AI-generated dilemma variants, with reasoning models more context-sensitive but les...