Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MT6: Multilingual Pretrained Text-to-Text Transformer with Translation Pairs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.08692 v2 pith:GM5FCRJF submitted 2021-04-18 cs.CL

MT6: Multilingual Pretrained Text-to-Text Transformer with Translation Pairs

classification cs.CL
keywords translationmultilingualtext-to-textcross-lingualcorruptionpairspre-trainingresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Multilingual T5 (mT5) pretrains a sequence-to-sequence model on massive monolingual texts, which has shown promising results on many cross-lingual tasks. In this paper, we improve multilingual text-to-text transfer Transformer with translation pairs (mT6). Specifically, we explore three cross-lingual text-to-text pre-training tasks, namely, machine translation, translation pair span corruption, and translation span corruption. In addition, we propose a partially non-autoregressive objective for text-to-text pre-training. We evaluate the methods on eight multilingual benchmark datasets, including sentence classification, named entity recognition, question answering, and abstractive summarization. Experimental results show that the proposed mT6 improves cross-lingual transferability over mT5.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Small Transformation Expose the Weakness of Semantic Similarity Measures

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    A diagnostic benchmark of text and code transformations finds embedding similarity metrics often conflate opposition with equivalence; LLM judges discriminate better, and Euclidean distance improves code embeddings.